Tuesday, August 12, 2014
BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — Federal wildlife officials plan to withdraw proposed protections for the snow-loving wolverine Tuesday, in a course reversal that highlights lingering uncertainties over what a warming climate means for some temperature-sensitive species.
Wolverines, or "mountain devils," are rarely seen members of the weasel family that need deep snow to den. But while there is broad consensus that climate change will make the world warmer, drilling down to determine what that means for individual species remains difficult.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe said predictions about climate change's localized impacts remain "ambiguous." Rejecting the conclusions of some of the agency's own scientists, Ashe said that made it impossible to determine whether less snow cover would put wolverines in danger of extinction in coming decades.
The decision carries potential ramifications for other species affected by climate change — from Alaska's bearded seals and the Pacific walrus to dozens of species of corals — as scientists and regulators grapple with limits on computer climate models.
The Associated Press obtained the decision prior to a formal announcement expected Tuesday.
"Climate change is a reality," Ashe said. "What we don't know with reliability is what does climate change mean for denning habitat that wolverines prefer."
He added, "It's possible wolverines are adapting and continuing to adapt."
Federal wildlife officials last year had said future temperature increases could melt snowfields in high elevation mountain ranges in the Lower 48 states where wolverines are found. They called for increased protections to keep the species from going extinct.
The first indication that stance had changed came last month, in a leaked memo from a Fish and Wildlife regional director in Denver who overturned her staff's recommendations for more wolverine protections.
Wildlife advocates blamed the reversal on pressure from state wildlife agencies and pledged to sue Ashe's agency in federal court to force it to adopt protections.
"Already there are impacts to wolverines that are threatening them. They have a really low population size, low genetic diversity and indirect impacts from trapping, winter recreation and habitat alteration," said Kylie Paul with Defenders of Wildlife. "Those threats will be made worse with the loss of snowpack across the West."
Officials from western states including Montana, Wyoming, Utah and Idaho had opposed federal protections, and said the animal's population has increased in some areas in recent decades.
That's similar to what happened to the bearded seal. It received protections from the National Marine Fisheries Service in 2012 only to lose them last month, when a federal judge sided with Alaska officials and said 100-year projections of sea ice losses were based on "speculative" forecasts from climate models.
At least two other species, the American pika and black-footed albatross, were denied protections in recent years after the government concluded some of the animals might die off because of climate change, but enough would survive to keep the populations viable.
But Ashe said when the evidence is clear his agency will act, such as the 2008 decision to list the polar bear as a threatened species because of sea ice losses in the arctic from global warming.
For wolverines, the withdrawal also means an end to the federal government's proposal to reintroduce the species to the southern Rocky Mountains of Colorado, Wyoming and New Mexico. Ashe said he intends to encourage the states' governors to pursue reintroductions on their own.
Once found throughout the Rocky Mountains and in California's Sierra Nevada mountain range, wolverines were wiped out across most of the U.S. by the 1930s due to unregulated trapping and poisoning campaigns, said Bob Inman, a wolverine researcher with the Wildlife Conservation Society.
In the decades since, they largely have recovered in parts of the West, where 250 to 300 of the animals live, but not in other parts of their historical range.
Steve Running, a University of Montana ecology professor and member of the Nobel Peace Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said computer models used to predict future temperatures and precipitation amounts become less accurate as they go further out in time. That makes it hard to localize potential impacts.
But Running added that climate trajectories over recent decades give an accurate depiction of what's in store and should be used by wildlife managers now to make long-term decisions. Over the past 50 years, he said, snow melt in the Northern Rockies has shifted two weeks earlier in the spring.
"If you take 50 more years and think of it as two more weeks earlier, wolverines are probably one of the classic poster children of a highly temperature-sensitive animal," he said.